In a recent CNN Tech article, "Computer spyware is newest weapon in Syrian conflict," correspondent Ben Brumfield tells us that the regime's supporters have created a virus that robs information from computers and passes it on to a server at a government-owned telecommunications company in Syria.
Syrians demonstrate against the regime after Friday prayers
in the northern Syrian city of Idlib on February 17. Activists
working against the regime now have to worry about
malware that can expose their activities.
Supporters of Syria's leader Bashar al-Assad first steal the identities of opposition activists, then impersonate them in online chats. They gain the trust of other users, pass out Trojan horse viruses, and encourage people to open them. Once on the victim's computer, the malware sends information out to third parties.
One of these viruses is capable of logging key strokes, taking screen shots, and rummaging through folders. It then hides the IP address to which it is sending this information.
This is a very scary set of circumstances for opponents of al-Assad's regime, because they never know when a mistake will implicate them or others. Furthermore, they don't know who to trust, since one of the ways the virus is spread is through regime proponents pretending to be opposition members. This is the dark side of anonymity.
We like to think that espionage like this is only happening in the Middle East, but recent articles have shown that our government is engaged in social media monitoring, as well. A February 18, 2012, AP article entitled "NYPD monitored Muslim students all over Northeast," tells us that "NYPD's Cyber Intelligence unit visited the websites, blogs and forums of Muslim student associations as a 'daily routine.' "
Many of the academic institutions whose Muslim student associations (MSAs) were under surveillance have protested what they regard as a violation of essential freedoms and "a reasonable expectation of privacy," but NYC's Mayor Bloomberg defends the actions of his police force, saying "We have to keep this country safe."
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is facing off
with Yale University over efforts by the NYPD
to monitor Muslim student groups. He says there
is nothing wrong with officers keeping an
eye on websites available to the general public.
NYPD spokesperson, Paul J. Browne, has pointed out that the information they have collected through surveillance of MSAs has come from "open sources" on the Internet. Mr. Browne further stated through an email: “Some of the most dangerous Western Al Qaeda-linked/inspired terrorists since 9/11 were radicalized and/or recruited at universities in MSAs. We were focused on radicalization and/or recruitment, specifically by groups like Al Muhajiroun, Islamic Thinkers Society, Revolution Muslim and others.”
Asked about the monitoring, Mr. Browne provided a list of 12 people arrested or convicted on terrorism charges in the United States and abroad, who had once been members of Muslim student associations, as evidence that this type of surveillance is worthwhile.
I have to admit that I'm conflicted. Having been a NYC resident at the time of 9/11, I am certainly with the Mayor in wanting to keep the city safe, but I wish there were some other way to do it. Even though monitoring "open sources" on the Internet is not the same as covertly launching malware on opposition activists' computers with the goal of stealing their personal information to implicate them and others, it is still a form of surveillance. Whereas Mayor Bloomberg feels that the NYPD's work monitoring MSAs is necessary to protect NYC, proponents of al-Assad's regime might feel that their work is equally important in protecting their government. Given the mores of their society, Syria's government supporters might see this as a perfectly acceptable way to protect themselves and their world.

Social Media has grown so important, that communities in Syria and even my own home country try to use to inform the world and ask for international help when the internal conflicts violate human rights. That's why some governments attempt to apply strict censorship, ban popular site and even prohibit sending personal pictures.
ReplyDeleteYep, governments know what a potent force social media is and that it is largely beyond their control, except for surveillance, like I've described above, and just shutting down the Internet in general, which gets to be impractical for other reasons.
DeleteI agree with you that it is just such a tricky situation to be in - we now have the technology to be able to monitor problematic issues and actually prevent things before they happen... but at what overall cost to our society? It's really a frustrating place to be in right now while we are still so steeped in the ideology of the importance of privacy (in the United States at least - in other countries, this mentality is not necessarily present or even considered important, which is something else to consider).
ReplyDelete